Green Party’s 2024 Election Manifesto: Business Breakdown
We all know there is an election around the corner on 4th July. With any campaigning, the focus on financials and taxation always plays a key part. We’ve pulled together some of the key topics from the various party’s manifestos. Whilst we know the proof is in the pudding in terms of the politicians delivering what they say in their manifestos, it is important for both your business and personal finances that you can identify a direction of travel from these policies.
Our goal is to provide an objective analysis of the business-related policies proposed by each party in the 2024 UK general election. We aim to present the potential impacts on businesses without any political bias, ensuring that our readers can make informed decisions based on the factual details of each manifesto.
This is a LIVE BLOG and will continue to be updated as information is released and analysed.
–
It’s important to be cautious with promises from the Green Party, as they are unlikely to form a government. They can propose ambitious policies without the pressure of having to implement them.
–
Business Impact of Implementing a Wealth Tax on Individual Taxpayers with Assets above £10 million
The Green Party’s proposed wealth tax aims to tax individual taxpayers with assets above £10 million at 1% and those with assets above £1 billion at 2% annually. While only a small minority would be subject to this tax, the overwhelming majority would potentially benefit. However, there is a difference between policy proposals and their actual implementation and effectiveness.
For businesses, high-net-worth individuals might alter investment strategies to minimize taxable assets, potentially leading to reduced investments in local businesses and markets. Business owners affected by the tax might have less capital to reinvest, possibly slowing expansion and innovation. The wealth tax could also influence corporate decision-making and ownership structures, as individuals seek to protect their wealth.
In terms of personal finance, the tax could lead to increased tax planning and asset reallocation among the wealthy, possibly involving trusts or offshore accounts. While the policy aims to reduce income inequality by redistributing wealth, its effectiveness depends on detailed implementation plans and compliance measures, which the Green Party has not provided. Without clear calculations and explanations, it is uncertain how much revenue the tax would generate and how it would impact overall economic stability.
–
Inheritance Tax
“We would reform inheritance tax, ensuring that intergenerational transfers of wealth are taxed more fairly” That is the only mention of “inheritance tax” in any of the Green Party materials. We do not know what reforms are proposed. Despite the absence of any proposals, the Green Party expects to book £4bn of new revenue from inheritance tax in 2026/27.
–
Business Impact of Implementing a Carbon Tax
The Green Party proposes a carbon tax starting at £120 per tonne and rising to £500 per tonne over ten years. This tax is intended to incentivize businesses to reduce emissions rather than pay the higher rates. The policy aims to raise up to £80 billion by the end of the parliament, with revenues decreasing as emissions decline.
For UK businesses, the carbon tax will significantly impact operations and finances. Initially, companies with high carbon emissions will face increased costs, prompting investment in cleaner technologies and practices to avoid the tax. This will likely result in substantial short-term capital expenditures as businesses upgrade infrastructure, adopt renewable energy sources, and enhance energy efficiency. In the long run, these investments could lower operational costs and improve sustainability.
However, the tax will also increase prices for fuel and other products, as businesses pass on the additional costs to consumers. This will affect all sectors, particularly those heavily reliant on fossil fuels, such as manufacturing, transportation, and agriculture. Higher production costs could impact profitability and competitiveness, forcing companies to reevaluate supply chains and explore alternative materials and processes.
The carbon tax is regressive, disproportionately affecting lower-income households. As businesses raise prices to offset the tax, consumers will face higher costs for goods and services, exacerbating financial strain on poorer and middle-income earners. Reduced consumer spending could affect overall demand and potentially slow economic growth.
Typically, carbon tax proposals include measures to redistribute a portion of the tax revenues to households through rebates or benefits. The Green Party’s carbon tax plan mentions funding for poorer households to convert to lower-carbon alternatives, but details are lacking, and no such funding is evident in their figures. Without adequate redistribution measures, the regressive effects of the carbon tax would remain unmitigated.
–
Impact of Proposed Tax Reforms on UK Businesses and High Earners
The Green Party proposes aligning tax rates on investment income with those on employment income and removing the Upper Earnings Limit on National Insurance contributions. They argue that tax rates should not decrease as income increases.
This reform would significantly impact many UK businesses. Higher tax rates on investment income could discourage investment in businesses, potentially reducing capital availability for expansion and innovation. Businesses might face higher costs as investors seek higher returns to compensate for increased taxes.
Removing the Upper Earnings Limit on National Insurance would increase labor costs for businesses employing high earners. This could affect their ability to attract and retain top talent, particularly in competitive sectors. Additionally, businesses might pass on these increased costs to consumers through higher prices, potentially affecting demand for goods and services.
Contrary to being a tax solely on the wealthiest, this proposal would impact a broad range of individuals. By 2027/28, it is expected that one in five taxpayers and one in four teachers would be affected. This suggests that many households will experience the effects of these changes, making it a more widespread tax reform than initially perceived.
–
Business and Financial Implications of Proposed Land Value Tax and Associated Reforms
The Green Party aims to implement a Land Value Tax (LVT), targeting those with the most valuable and largest land holdings. In the next parliament, they propose re-evaluating Council Tax bands, removing business rate relief on certain properties, and surveying all landholdings.
For businesses, re-evaluating Council Tax bands to reflect property value changes since the 1990s could lead to higher taxes in high-value areas, increasing operating costs and affecting profitability. Companies may need to adjust their budgets to manage these expenses.
Removing business rate relief on Enterprise Zones, Freeports, petrol stations, and most empty properties would raise costs for businesses in these areas, potentially leading to reduced investment, hiring, or even closures.
A survey of all landholdings aims to ensure fair taxation based on land value. This could lead to higher taxes for businesses with extensive or valuable land assets, prompting a reassessment of land use and investment strategies.
While these proposals aim for a fairer tax system, they could result in increased costs for businesses, affecting financial stability, investment decisions, and competitiveness. The impact will depend on effective and fair implementation.
–
Business Impact of Proposed Tax Raise
The Green Party propose raising taxes by £115bn in 2026/27 and £172bn in 2029/30 – about 4.5% of GDP. There is very little detail presented and the proposals are impossible to assess in any depth.
–
Business Impact of Investing in the Transition to a Green Economy.
The proposal to invest £40 billion annually to transition to a green economy, funded by a new carbon tax and wealth taxes, could have several effects on businesses and their activities.
For businesses, the introduction of a carbon tax would likely increase operating costs, particularly for those in carbon-intensive industries. Companies might need to invest in cleaner technologies and processes to reduce their tax burden, leading to significant upfront expenses but potential long-term savings and sustainability benefits. The increased costs could be passed on to consumers, potentially affecting demand for certain products and services.
Wealth taxes could impact high-net-worth individuals and businesses, reducing available capital for investment and expansion. This might lead to more conservative financial strategies and a focus on cost-efficiency.
The annual £40 billion investment in the green economy could stimulate growth in renewable energy, sustainable infrastructure, and green technologies. Businesses in these sectors could see increased demand and opportunities for innovation and expansion. However, the effectiveness of these investments would depend on efficient allocation and management of the funds.
Overall, while the proposed measures aim to promote a green economy, their success will depend on careful implementation and the ability of businesses to adapt to new tax structures and leverage investment opportunities.
–
Impacts of Nationalising the Railways, Water Companies and the Big Five Energy Firms
The proposal to nationalise the railways, water companies, and the big five energy firms could have several significant effects on businesses and their activities.
For businesses operating in these sectors, nationalisation would mean a transfer of ownership from private to public hands. This could lead to changes in management, operational strategies, and investment priorities. The uncertainty during the transition period might affect business stability and planning. Private investors in these companies could face financial losses, as their assets would be taken over by the government, potentially at below-market rates.
For other businesses, nationalisation could result in changes to service costs and quality. Government control might lead to more stable pricing and a focus on public service over profit. This could benefit businesses relying on these utilities by providing more predictable costs and potentially improved infrastructure and services. However, the effectiveness of these improvements would depend on how efficiently the government manages these entities.
In terms of broader business activities, nationalisation could impact market dynamics and competition. The removal of private competition in these sectors might lead to less innovation and efficiency, as public enterprises may lack the profit incentives that drive private firms. On the other hand, it could ensure that essential services are more accessible and equitably distributed, benefiting smaller businesses and the general public.
Overall, while the goal of nationalisation is to improve public welfare and service reliability, its success will depend on effective government management and the ability to maintain or enhance service quality and efficiency. The transition could create short-term disruptions and long-term changes in the business landscape.
–
