Labour’s 2024 Election Manifesto: Business Breakdown
–
Business Impact of Increased SDLT for Non-Resident Shareholders
If Labour wins the British election, they plan to increase the Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) for properties owned by businesses or individuals with non-resident shareholders from a 2% additional surcharge to 3%. This change aims to raise more revenue from international property investments.
For businesses, this policy means higher costs when acquiring land or property in the UK. Increased SDLT may deter foreign investments, particularly in commercial real estate, as the additional expense affects overall transaction costs. Companies may need to reallocate funds, affecting their cash flow and financial planning. This could slow down the property market for transactions involving international investors, potentially leading to reduced demand and price adjustments in certain areas.
Businesses with non-resident shareholders will need to reassess their investment strategies, possibly seeking alternative financing or structuring options to mitigate the increased tax burden. Legal advice and lobbying for exemptions may also be considered to minimise the impact. This policy reflects Labour’s commitment to generating revenue through taxation on foreign property investments while aiming to balance the property market dynamics.
–
Business Impact of Crackdown on Tax Avoidance
Current Labour Party policy is to raise £5.2bn per year by 2028-29, through a combination of closing non-dom loopholes and reducing tax avoidance in order to close the tax gap. The feasibility of raising this figure is somewhat questionable, as the tax gap is made up of a variety of factors, such as taxpayer errors, avoidance and evasion; Labour don’t specify what they will be cracking down upon.
If they plan to focus simply on avoidance and no other causes, they will find it particularly difficult to reach the £5.2bn figure, as only £1.8bn was caused by tax avoidance, according to HMRC’s own figures for the 22-23 tax year. £1bn of this was avoidance of Corporation Tax, so if Labour does act to close loopholes, this will most likely result in an increase in CT for those using them.
Figure 1: Tax gap by customer behaviour – share of tax gap, 2019 to 2020 to 2022 to 2023
The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) says that the tax gap can “probably” be reduced further, but added that the law of diminishing returns meant “further marginal gains are becoming harder to come by”.
–
Business Impact of “Major Changes to Employment Law”
Businesses can expect significant impacts from the proposed changes to employment law under a new Labour government, set to occur within the first 100 days. These changes could affect hiring practices, employee rights, and workplace regulations, potentially increasing compliance costs and administrative burdens. Companies may need to update policies and procedures to align with new legal requirements, which could lead to temporary disruptions in operations. The actual effects will depend on the specifics of the new laws and how effectively businesses can adapt.
Leaving just over three months for full consultation and draft legislation to get through parliament over a summer recess could be a challenge, but key measures including making flexible working the default from day one, banning one-sided flexibility zero-hour contracts, and day one rights for unfair dismissal, sick pay and paternity pay, among others.
–
Business Impact of Capping Corporation Tax at 25%
Capping corporation tax at its current level of 25% could have several effects on businesses and their activities.
For businesses, maintaining the corporation tax rate at 25% provides stability and predictability in tax planning. Companies can make long-term investment decisions without the concern of potential tax rate increases, enhancing confidence and encouraging capital expenditure. This stability might attract foreign investment, as predictable tax policies are a key factor for international investors.
However, capping the tax rate also means that any potential government revenue from future increases is forfeited, possibly limiting public spending or necessitating cuts in other areas. Businesses that benefit from government contracts or public services might feel the impact if government revenue constraints lead to reduced public investment.
Overall, while capping corporation tax at 25% aims to provide a stable tax environment and encourage investment, its effectiveness will depend on broader economic conditions and government fiscal policies.
–